Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable research skill: executable commands, a real script bundle, and a well-organized official-source directory with clear boundary guidance. The workflow lacks an explicit validation checkpoint and the inline URL table could be split out, which are the only things keeping it from full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no explaining of what official sources are or how Python works, every section (credential config, workflow, API script, resource table, boundaries) earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready executable commands ("python scripts/free_market_api.py cninfo-announcements --keyword 年报 --start-date ..."), a command-to-source table, and three concrete example invocations covering common cases, plus a per-resource URL table with usage notes, match anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequenced workflow with an explicit script-to-browser-use fallback and error-handling guidance (switch source on blank/protected page, do not retry), but there is no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean section headers and a real referenced bundle file (scripts/free_market_api.py, confirmed present and named in the body) keep structure good; the 27-row browser-use URL table is inline rather than split into a reference file, a minor organization gap that holds it at anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |