Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable guide with concrete commands, real OrchardCore API examples, and clean progressive disclosure to reference files. The main gap is the absence of an explicit build-failure feedback loop in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation feedback loop in Step 6: if `dotnet build` fails, read the errors, fix the module, and rebuild before running.
Trim the opening "This skill guides you through creating new OrchardCore modules following project conventions." line; the title and description already convey this.
Inline a minimal Manifest.cs and .csproj template rather than only pointing to references, so the three required files from Step 3 are immediately actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and mostly tables, file listings, and code blocks with no padded concept explanations, though the opening "This skill guides you through..." line and a few table rows could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands (mkdir, dotnet build, dotnet run) and real OrchardCore API code (AddContentPart, UseDisplayDriver, AddDataMigration, AddPermissionProvider, AddNavigationProvider) are provided; full templates are deferred to references, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence runs from module-type selection through build and run, with the build step acting as a checkpoint, but no explicit error-recovery feedback loop is documented. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references to verified bundle files (module-structure.md, patterns.md, examples.md) and AGENTS.md, with content appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |