Conciseness

The body is operational throughout (no explanations of concepts Claude already knows), but it is ~280 lines with repeated guidance: file-location rules appear three times (the "Dateispeicherort" section, the Schnellstart note "Planungsdateien kommen in das ausgewählte Aufgabenverzeichnis deines Projekts", and the Anti-Muster row "Dateien im Skill-Verzeichnis erstellen → Dateien im Projekt erstellen"), and the session-catchup boundary policy is fully stated both in Schritt 1 and again in the Skripte section. Mostly efficient but could be tightened — matches the score-3 anchor.

Actionability

Concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready commands cover the main cases: "scripts/init-session.sh \"Task Name\"", "sh \"$PWF_SKILL_DIR/scripts/check-complete.sh\" --validate path/to/task_plan.md", the full bash and PowerShell invocations of "session-catchup.py --metadata/--replay", and "set-active-plan.sh --list / --archive / --yes / --restore" — all referencing scripts that exist in the bundle. Not 5 because of minor gaps: the set-active-plan command uses a "<skill-dir>" placeholder requiring substitution, and PLAN_ID/PWF_PLAN_ROOT pinning is described but never shown as a command.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit with validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops: restore state (Schritt 1 through resolve-plan-dir and "git diff --stat") → init/adapt plan → "Die Prüfung muss vor der Umsetzung und nach Änderungen an der Phasenstruktur bestehen" (validate before and after) → per-phase status updates → the Drei-Versuche-Protokoll escalation loop ending in asking the user, plus checklists (Fünf-Fragen-Neustarttest, decision matrix). This matches the score-5 anchor: clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops, checklists.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized and script references are real, but scored against the actual bundle (SKILL.md + scripts/ only, no templates/ or references/ directories), several referenced paths are dangling: "[templates/task_plan.md](templates/task_plan.md)", "[templates/findings.md](templates/findings.md)", "[templates/progress.md](templates/progress.md)", and "[plan-inventory.md](plan-inventory.md)" point to files absent from the bundle, making the "Kopiere diese Vorlagen" instruction non-actionable from the shipped skill. Not 4 because broken references are more than a minor organization gap; not 2 because the body itself is structured and navigable, and the majority of references (all scripts) resolve.

Specificity

Concrete actions are named: "Hält task_plan.md, findings.md und progress.md auf dem Datenträger", "Lebenszyklus-Hooks speisen ausgewählten Planungskontext des Projekts ein", "Die automatische Wiederherstellung liest nur die Planungsdateien des Projekts" — several specific actions with named artifacts. Not 5 because a large middle portion is policy/constraint text ("Nur ein ausdrücklicher Aufruf von session-catchup.py --metadata darf...", "keinen Netzwerk-Uploadpfad") rather than capabilities, and real capabilities (init, validation, plan listing/archiving) are unmentioned; not 3 because it goes well beyond 1-2 actions.

Completeness

Both parts are present: a clear 'what' ("Persistente dateibasierte Planung... Hält task_plan.md, findings.md und progress.md auf dem Datenträger") and an explicit 'when' ("Verwenden für Forschung oder Arbeit mit mehr als 5 Tool-Aufrufen"). Not 5 because the trigger clause is narrow — it omits 'multi-step tasks' and 'projects' even though the 'what' names multi-step work as the core use case; not 3 because the 'when' is explicit, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user terms present: "Planung", "mehrstufige Arbeit", "Forschung", "Verwenden für... Arbeit mit mehr als 5 Tool-Aufrufen". Good coverage of the core natural phrases, but common variations are missing ("Projekt", "organisieren", "Fortschritt verfolgen", "Aufgaben") and "mehr als 5 Tool-Aufrufen" is agent-internal phrasing a user would not naturally say — matches the 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' anchor rather than comprehensive coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinct: it names specific files ("task_plan.md, findings.md und progress.md"), a specific script ("session-catchup.py"), lifecycle hooks, and a gate mode — a clear persistent-planning niche with trigger phrases unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Not 4 because there is no meaningful overlap risk with other skills beyond the intentionally related English variant.