Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and workflow-safe: executable code with inline validation, an explicit error-recovery loop, and a thorough verification checklist for a destructive operation. The only notable weakness is a generic Supabase boilerplate section that pads token cost and could live in a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, Paddle-specific knowledge Claude cannot be assumed to have (paused-subscription 400 behavior, the 30-minute lock, `scheduledChange` vs `canceled`, pitfalls), but the ~50 lines of generic Supabase helper boilerplate and the env-var listing are over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready server action with complete imports, auth and ownership checks, paused-status branching, typed error mapping, revalidatePath, a slim DTO, a working undo action, and specific expected outputs ("{ success: true, status: 'active', scheduledChange: '<some date>' }"). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered steps (1–6) are sequenced inline, an explicit error-recovery loop maps ApiError codes to user messages and rethrows the rest, and a 7-item verification checklist — including adversarial checks (logged out, forged subscriptionId, confirming the SDK was NOT called) — covers this destructive operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned file with clearly signaled sibling-skill and external-doc links one level deep, but no bundle files exist and ~50 lines of Supabase helper boilerplate sit inline where a separate reference file would fit better. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |