Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable, well-structured workflow with concrete scripts, a clear round sequence, and validation/feedback via the native Stop hook. Main weaknesses are template-dependent commands and a large inline options table that could be split out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient: it uses templated paths, terse section headers, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, with only minor padding in the long "What This Enforces" bullet list. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete executable scripts (setup-rlcr-loop.sh, cancel-rlcr-loop.sh), specific file paths, and an options table with defaults; the only gap is reliance on {{HUMANIZE_RUNTIME_ROOT}} template hydration rather than literal commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered Setup -> Work Round sequence is present with an explicit setup-exit validation checkpoint and a hook-blocks feedback loop for error recovery; validation is partly delegated to the Stop hook rather than fully spelled out inline. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single file is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Runtime Root, Required Sequence, Critical Rules, Options, Usage, Cancel) with runtime scripts referenced one level deep; the inlined options table is the only minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |