Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable migration skill: concrete code, exact commands, a useful decision table, and clean progressive disclosure into two real reference files. The only slack is a mildly trimmable under-the-hood section and an implicit rather than explicit validation feedback loop.
Suggestions
Consider trimming or condensing the 'How generated functions work under the hood' section — the reassurance that HTTP behavior is unchanged could be a single line rather than a code diagram.
Make the verification feedback loop explicit, e.g. 'If typescript:check fails, fix the reported call sites and re-run before proceeding' to mirror the validate→fix→retry pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assume Claude's competence, but the 'How generated functions work under the hood' section and the pipeline re-statement in the Overview are minor instances that could be trimmed without losing actionable value. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: concrete import paths, copy-paste import conventions, exact commands ('pnpm --filter=@posthog/frontend typescript:check', 'hogli build:openapi', 'hogli test'), and a decision table mapping scenarios to concrete actions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence plus a 'Verifying the migration' checklist (typescript:check, grep for leftover types, run tests) provides real validation checkpoints, but the error-recovery feedback loop is implicit rather than an explicit 'if check fails, fix and re-run'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (references/type-compatibility.md and references/migration-patterns.md, both real files with no further nesting); detail appropriately split out and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |