Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, operationally dense skill body: concrete tooling, a complete worked example, an explicitly sequenced lifecycle with validation and error-recovery loops, and well-structured one-level references. Token-efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense throughout; assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what MCP/workflows are in general terms) and every clause carries operational specifics rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: concrete MCP tool names (workflows-create, workflows-test-run, workflows-patch-graph, etc.), specific patch operations, and a complete copy-paste-ready JSON worked example covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step lifecycle with validation checkpoints ('Every edit invalidates your earlier test — re-run', 're-test the path you changed') and error-recovery feedback loops (skipped→fix payload→re-run; publish 409/400→preview again), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files ([references/graph-schema.md], [references/lifecycle-and-debugging.md]); bulk schema and tool catalog appropriately split out, leaving SKILL.md as a navigable overview. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |