Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body: a sequenced workflow with validation and recovery loops, concrete tool calls and parameters, and clean single-level organization. It is nearly lean throughout, with only a few trimmable justifying clauses.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no padded explanations of what feature flags are — but a few justifying clauses (e.g. 'turning a flag on in a new project should be a deliberate, observed action') could be trimmed, keeping it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It names exact tools, required and optional fields, default values, response array shapes, and common failure causes, and a worked example interaction demonstrates a complete copy with concrete parameters — fully actionable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow has explicit validation checkpoints (preview the source flag, confirm copy options) and an error-recovery feedback loop (per-target success/failed arrays, then ask to retry/skip/fix), which is appropriate for this destructive batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is self-contained with clear, single-level section headers (When to use, Does not cover, Workflow, Important notes, Example, Available tools) and no nested references; no bundle files exist and nothing here clearly belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |