Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured guide: it specifies the tool and fields, sequences the workflow with disambiguation and a destructive-action checkpoint, and stays concise with clean sectioning. It is a strong example of a simple, single-purpose skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and focused throughout with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (tool guidance, matching fields, disambiguation, examples, guardrails) earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Names the exact tool (`experiment-list`), enumerates the specific fields to scan (name, status, feature_flag_key, recency), and prescribes the follow-up `experiment-get` call — concrete and copy-ready despite being instruction-only. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence from search to match handling with explicit one/multiple/no-match branches and a validation checkpoint ("Confirm with the user by name before destructive actions") plus a "When NOT to search" guardrail. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; it is well-organized into clearly signaled sections, qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |