Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete commands and file paths. It is slightly verbose in its conceptual opening and lacks an explicit validation checkpoint, but it navigates clearly and is mostly copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph that re-explains what a mode is; assume Claude understands the concept after the description.
Add an explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint (e.g., run schema build/tests and confirm before moving to the next step).
Consider moving the detailed feature-flag code example into a referenced file to keep the main flow lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient step-by-step instructions, but it opens by re-explaining what a mode is ('A mode is a way to manage the context...') and includes explanatory asides that Claude could infer. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths and executable commands ('hogli build:schema', 'pnpm run schema:build') plus a code example, with only minor gaps in how each step's edits are specified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, sequenced multi-step process with headers and a user loop-back checkpoint for tool dependencies; validation is implicit (tests/feature-flag rules) rather than an explicit validate-then-proceed loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into logical sections with no nested references and no bundle files, though the single file runs longer than ideal and could split reference details out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |