Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The orchestrator body is lean, well-sequenced, and rich with concrete tool/field references and validation checkpoints. Its main defect is packaging: every detailed playbook and helper script it points to is missing from the bundle, so the progressive-disclosure skeleton leads nowhere and the executable script commands cannot run.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (references/*.md playbooks, shared-patterns.md, common-causes.md, scripts/*.py) so the one-level-deep progressive-disclosure links resolve and the skill is functional as a complete artifact.
Since the helper scripts are currently absent, either inline a minimal fallback for compare_to_prior_periods.py / breakdown_attribution.py or note in the body that they must be present before running the quoted commands.
Add a one-line note in Step 3 on what a playbook provides (numbered diagnostic steps + confirming queries) so the orchestration flow is not a black box when a playbook file is missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense with no padding over concepts Claude already knows (tables for tools, terse step descriptions), though the findings template plus the confidence rule-of-thumb add length that could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete in-text guidance exists (exact tool names, fields like 'kind', 'series', 'dateRange', 'compareFilter: {"compare": true}', and script invocation syntax), but the two referenced helper scripts and the per-kind playbook steps that hold the bulk of executable detail are absent from the bundle, so the script commands are not actually runnable and key steps are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced with sub-steps and explicit validation checkpoints (2.2 'If the movement is normal variance, report that and stop'; Step 4 control-segment cross-check) plus a confidence checklist, but Step 3 delegates the detailed procedure to playbooks that are not present, leaving a gap in the flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview is well organized with a dedicated Reference files section and clearly signaled, one-level-deep links to 11 files, but none of those files (7 playbooks, shared-patterns.md, common-causes.md, 2 scripts) exist in the bundle, so the disclosed content cannot be reached or verified — capping the structure at mid-range. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |