Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable decision framework with concrete examples, a clearly sequenced workflow, and well-organized self-contained sections. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence — it names SSRF, IDOR, unsafe deserialization and path traversal without explaining them — with only minor framing in the opening paragraphs that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete decision criteria with worked examples ('if `items` is empty this raises `IndexError`', 'this query runs once per row -> N+1 on the dashboard'), an explicit skepticism test ('If you can't name both, be skeptical'), and named output fields (is_valid, argumentation, category) — fully actionable for a judgment skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit reachability-validation step (step 2: trace call sites, types, validation) and a tie-break rule (step 4: on the fence -> drop); no retry loop is present, but the verdict task does not require one and is not destructive or batch. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained and well-organized into three clear sections (Keep, Drop, How to decide) with no need for external references or file splitting, satisfying the well-organized-sections exception for skills that need no bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |