Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, checkpointed workflow and dense domain-specific gotchas; its main weakness is moderate verbosity in the framing prose. It is a strong, operationally ready skill.
Suggestions
Tighten the opening framing paragraph and a few explanatory asides to reduce token cost without losing the signal-vs-noise mental model.
Consider extracting the MCP tools reference block into a references file so the core run workflow stays lean and scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with non-obvious domain knowledge (tool params, thresholds, state codes, footguns), but the opening framing paragraph and several prose explanations could be tightened without losing the mental model. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: copy-paste-ready SQL queries, exact tool calls with parameters, numeric thresholds (≥10% share, ≥50 triggered), state-code enumerations, and concrete key-naming conventions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced run lifecycle (orient → profile → explore → save memory → decide → close out) with explicit validation checkpoints (fleet normalization, inbox search before authoring, dedupe gates) and feedback loops (edit-vs-author rules, edit-or-skip on relapse). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single file with clear section headers and a reference-like MCP tools block; no bundle files exist, and most content is appropriately inline, though the tools reference and disqualifiers could arguably live in separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |