Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced scouting playbook with executable SQL, concrete tool parameters, and clear validation checkpoints; its main weaknesses are occasional verbosity and a fully monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to external reference files.
Suggestions
Extract the stable 'MCP tools' reference (and possibly the 'Territory' / 'Disqualifiers' rules) into a bundled reference file linked once from the body, enabling progressive disclosure to score 3.
Tighten the longest compound sentences (e.g. the Decide paragraph's edit/author/priority guidance) into shorter bullet clauses to improve conciseness without losing the concrete detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most tokens earn their place as project-specific knowledge (severity enums, debounce behavior, MCP tool semantics) that Claude lacks, but several long compound sentences and repeated framing ('Counts are debounced, not exact ... don't quote them as event counts') could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready: named MCP tools with parameters (`ingestion-warnings-list` with `since=-7d`, `samples` up to 50), an executable SQL query (`SELECT properties.$lib, properties.$lib_version, count() FROM events ... GROUP BY 1, 2 ORDER BY 3 DESC`), and concrete report fields (priority P2/P3, `repository=NO_REPO`), matching the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The run is explicitly sequenced (Get oriented → Profile shape → Explore → Save memory → Decide → Close out) with validation checkpoints: the 'is the stream even loud?' close-out gate, inbox dedupe-before-author, and `execute-sql` corroboration 'before putting numbers in a report', matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear headers, a shape table, and bullet lists (not a wall of text), but it is monolithic — no bundle files exist and all content (MCP tool reference, territory rules, disqualifiers) is inline with no one-level-deep references, so it stops short of the 'clear overview with well-signaled references' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |