Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable, well-structured scout body that offloads the SQL cookbook to a reference and sequences the workflow with validation checkpoints. It is somewhat verbose with repeated emphasis, and the referenced queries.md bundle is not present to verify.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "edit an existing report rather than authoring a new one" guidance, which is restated in several sections, to reduce length.
Tighten dense prose blocks (e.g. the signal-vs-noise discriminator and Decide rails) into scannable lists where possible without losing the nuance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and information-dense with genuinely novel domain knowledge, but the ~198-line body repeats several points (e.g. the "edit not new report" rule) and could be tightened in places. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete HogQL access patterns, exact field names, specific tool names, and exact memory-key formats give mostly executable guidance; the full SQL lives in the offloaded cookbook, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced workflow (close-out → orient → probe → grain → lenses → memory → decide → fix loop → close out) with decision rails and validation checkpoints (probe first, search inbox, disqualifiers); minor checkpoint gaps keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to references/queries.md and baked-in deep-dive skills; good structure with minor organization gaps, and the referenced bundle file is not present in the review directory to fully verify. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |