Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable, with concrete tool/parameter guidance and a clear result-interpretation workflow that includes error-recovery branches. The only minor weakness is a few explanatory sentences that slightly pad the otherwise efficient prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence (parameters with defaults, a compact JSON result sample), but a few explanatory sentences restating what 'verified: true' means in prose could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable: specifies the exact MCP tool name ('simulate_new_user'), every parameter with types, defaults, and concrete example values, plus a real result JSONC block covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Interpreting the result' section sequences verification into explicit decision branches (verified true, pageviews:0 -> run check_posthog_loading, non-2xx -> check ingestion limits), providing clear feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files; content is well-organized into focused sections (When to use, How to invoke, Interpreting the result), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |