Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured workflow that names real tools and decision criteria with an explicit verification checklist and troubleshooting loop. No bundle files exist, so progressive disclosure rests on the clean in-file organization, which is strong.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and purposeful body with no padding about what PostHog or a browser is; a few minor explanatory asides (e.g. the ~30s ingestion lag note) could be trimmed but most every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact MCP tools and concrete return fields to inspect (check_posthog_loading, simulate_new_user, simulate_returning_user, loaded, api_key, api_host, verified), giving fully executable guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced steps with an explicit "verified when" checklist and a troubleshooting feedback loop ("If Steps 1 and 2 pass but events don't show up..."), matching the anchor for clear sequence with validation steps and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file (no bundle present) that is well organized into clear sections; per the simple-skill guidance, well-organized single-file content with no need for external references scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |