notion-meeting-intelligence

Prepares meeting materials by gathering context from Notion, enriching with Claude research, and creating both an internal pre-read and external agenda saved to Notion. Helps you arrive prepared with comprehensive background and structured meeting docs.

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./notion-meeting-intelligence/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with concrete Notion tool calls and detailed document templates, and the workflow is clearly sequenced. Its main weaknesses are verbosity/redundancy, missing inline validation checkpoints, and dangling references to bundle files that are not present.

Suggestions

Create the referenced bundle files (reference/template-selection-guide.md and the four examples/*.md) or remove the dangling references so progressive disclosure points to real material.

Deduplicate the body: collapse 'Research Enrichment Patterns' into Step 4 and 'Document Types' into Steps 5-6, and cite the template guide once instead of three times.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow (e.g. confirm created page URLs, verify cross-links resolve between pre-read and agenda) before marking a step complete.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly structured lists rather than concept explanation, but it is verbose and redundant — 'Research Enrichment Patterns' largely restates Step 4, 'Document Types' overlaps Steps 5-6, and the same template-selection-guide reference is repeated three times.	2 / 3
Actionability	Concrete, specific guidance is given throughout — named Notion tools (Notion:notion-search, notion-fetch, notion-create-pages), explicit document titles, full section-by-section templates for the pre-read and agenda, and concrete search filters (created_by_user_ids, created_date_range).	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 7-step sequence with a Quick Start overview is present, but there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints in the workflow; error handling lives only in a separate 'Common Issues' section rather than inline feedback loops.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	References to reference/template-selection-guide.md and examples/*.md are well-signaled and one level deep, but those bundle files do not exist in the skill package, and substantial template content that should live in the reference is instead inlined in Steps 5-6.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a concrete, distinctive Notion meeting-prep workflow but is held back by missing explicit trigger guidance and a second-person voice that violates the rubric. It is solid but not exemplary.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to prep for a meeting, prepare meeting materials, or create an agenda or pre-read in Notion.'

Rewrite in third person to remove 'Helps you arrive prepared' (e.g. 'Prepares the user to arrive...').

Include common trigger variations users would actually say ('meeting prep', 'prepare for a meeting', 'meeting agenda').

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Concrete actions are listed ('gathering context from Notion, enriching with Claude research, and creating both an internal pre-read and external agenda saved to Notion'), which would warrant a 3, but the second-person phrasing 'Helps you arrive prepared' triggers the rubric's -1 voice penalty.	2 / 3
Completeness	The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so per the rubric 'when' is only implied and completeness is capped at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant terms like 'meeting materials', 'pre-read', 'agenda', and 'Notion' appear, but common natural variations a user would say ('meeting prep', 'prepare for a meeting') are missing and there is no explicit trigger clause.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Notion-specific dual-document meeting-prep niche ('internal pre-read and external agenda saved to Notion') is distinct and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 8 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: Prat011/awesome-llm-skills
Path: notion-meeting-intelligence/SKILL.md
Commit: 35e1ea2

Reviewed: about 12 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.