Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sectioned instruction-only guide with concrete Ammo.js parameters and APIs, but it is organized as a symptom catalog rather than a sequenced workflow and includes some dramatic padding. Adding a validation/recovery loop and trimming flourish would improve it.
Suggestions
Trim dramatic phrasing (e.g. "超音速抛出", "毁灭性的原形复原能力") to lift conciseness from 3 toward 4-5.
Add a brief ordered tuning workflow with a verification checkpoint (e.g. "apply fix → reload scene → confirm no tearing/freeze for 60 frames") to raise workflow_clarity.
Optionally include one small executable code snippet (e.g. the velocity-limiter loop) to push actionability from 4 to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The symptom→cause→solution structure is mostly efficient, but dramatic padding ("滚筒洗衣机效用", "超音速抛出", "毁灭性的原形复原能力") and explanatory flourishes could be tightened; fits anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete APIs and parameters (setCenterOfMassTransform, setActivationState(4), MotionState sync, LinearVelocity>50, AngularVelocity>30, ERP 0.8, CFM 0.015, scale 1.0/margin 0.05, btBoxShape 100x1x100) with only minor gaps in exact call sites, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Organized by symptom→cause→solution rather than as a sequenced process, with no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops; fits anchor 3 (structure present but checkpoints missing/implicit). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single file under 50 lines with well-organized sections by symptom and numbered problem; no external references needed, so the simple-skill exception yields a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |