Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill: executable code for all three techniques with a clear recommendation and a decision table. Main gaps are the repeated hardcoded model version, missing JSON-parse failure guidance for the prefill and system-prompt methods, and no offload of schema examples to a reference file.
Suggestions
Replace the three hardcoded 'claude-opus-4-6' model strings with a single variable or a placeholder note, since pinned versions go stale and are not in a deprecated/old-patterns section.
Add brief failure-handling for Methods 2 and 3 (e.g., what to do when json.loads fails on malformed output, such as retrying with a corrective message), which would also strengthen workflow clarity.
Move the 'Common Extraction Schemas' examples into a references/ file (e.g., SCHEMAS.md) linked from the body, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and code-first with no padded concept explanations, but the hardcoded version string 'claude-opus-4-6' is repeated three times — time-sensitive version info outside any deprecated section, which the guidelines say should penalize conciseness. Efficient overall with minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | All three methods are given as fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python with worked examples and expected return values (contact extraction, classification), covering the common cases. Matches the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear method ordering with an explicit recommendation ('Tool use (Recommended)'), a stated decision basis ('Choose based on complexity'), and a reliability/best-for quick reference table. Not a destructive or batch workflow so the validation cap does not apply, but explicit checkpoints are incomplete: Methods 2 and 3 call json.loads with no failure or retry guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers and no dangling references (no bundle files exist and the body links to none). It sits above the simple-skill threshold at ~135 lines, and content like the 'Common Extraction Schemas' section could be split into a reference file, keeping it at 'good structure; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |