Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, code-heavy skill body with executable patterns and clear section structure. Its only real weaknesses are a time-sensitive model version pin and the absence of an explicit output-validation checkpoint in the loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, mostly executable code with minimal prose and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the hardcoded `model="claude-opus-4-6"` is a time-sensitive version pin that should be trimmed or parameterized. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code for tool definition, the agentic loop, and parallel execution, plus a concrete Quick Reference table covering the common cases (error retry, tool_choice forcing). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The agentic loop is clearly sequenced with stop_reason checkpoints and error-recovery feedback (try/except → error result → Claude retry), but lacks an explicit validation step or checklist for the final output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Basic Tool Definition, Agentic Loop, Parallel Execution, Quick Reference) with no nested references, though everything is inlined in one file with no external references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |