CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

api-overview

Modern API category — gRPC, SOAP/WSDL, WebSocket, Server-Sent Events. Routing skill: identify the API protocol from the response Content-Type or wire format, then load the matching sub-skill.

73

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary lean routing skill: every section earns its place, commands are executable, and the structure cleanly points outward to the matching sub-skills. No weaknesses across the content dimensions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no concept padding — it jumps to a sub-skill table, executable fingerprint commands, and a sibling-skill pointer, assuming Claude already knows what these protocols are.

3 / 3

Actionability

The "Quick fingerprint" section gives copy-paste-ready curl commands per protocol, and the sub-skill table names concrete sub-skills and wire signatures to match against.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose routing skill under 50 lines, its flow (fingerprint -> identify -> load sub-skill) is unambiguous, and the fingerprint commands double as confirmation checkpoints (e.g. "101 = WS upgrade", "500 with SOAP fault").

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed; content is split into well-organized sections (Sub-skills, Quick fingerprint, Sibling skills) with one-level-deep references to sub-skills and a sibling skill.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, specific routing description with good trigger-term coverage and a clear niche. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit "Use when..." clause, which leaves the invocation trigger implied rather than stated.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the target exposes a non-REST API protocol (gRPC, SOAP/WSDL, WebSocket, or Server-Sent Events) and you need to pick the right exploitation sub-skill."

Add common shorthand variations users might say (e.g. "SSE", "WS", "WSDL") to the description itself rather than only the when_to_use metadata.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions — "identify the API protocol from the response Content-Type or wire format, then load the matching sub-skill" — and enumerates the specific protocols, rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does (identify protocol, load sub-skill) but lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, so the "when" is only implied; the rubric caps completeness at 2 in that case.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural terms a user would say — "gRPC, SOAP/WSDL, WebSocket, Server-Sent Events" — covering the common variations for this protocol family.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named modern-protocol niche (gRPC/SOAP/WebSocket/SSE) is clearly distinct from REST/GraphQL skills and unlikely to trigger the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.