Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable body: executable commands for every variant, a decision-gated workflow, and explicit RoE/OPSEC guardrails with almost no padding. The only notable gap is the absence of a post-action verification loop for the destructive broadcast/DoS paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: concrete commands with only operationally useful comments (e.g. '5–10 seconds is enough to collect multiple beacons'), a compact decision table, and no explanation of 802.11, PMF, or tool basics Claude already knows. Every section earns its tokens, matching the 5 anchor rather than 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with parameter placeholders throughout — airodump-ng capture, tshark RSN-capability decoding, aireplay-ng targeted/broadcast deauth, mdk4 flood variants, and a concrete scapy SA-Query frame. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with an explicit PMF-state decision table before any deauth, prerequisites, an explicit RoE hard-stop gate for broadcast/DoS actions, and verification cues ('Confirm the client reassociates', watch for 'WPA handshake' header). It is not 5 because the destructive broadcast/DoS paths have a pre-flight gate but no post-action verify/retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so all content is a single well-sectioned file with clear headers and a References section pointing to sibling skills. Well-organized with minor gaps (e.g. the scapy SA-Query block could live in scripts/), matching 4 rather than 5 since the one-level-deep reference pattern is unused and the file exceeds the simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |