Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, well-structured, and actionable with a clear multi-step workflow and confirmation gates. Minor gaps are in executable code formality and explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after binding the workspace (e.g., confirm load_opplan succeeded before reading planning docs).
Show the exact expected return shape of load_opplan so the resume-vs-new branch decision is unambiguous.
Consider a short 'Expected output' note for the delegation to Soundwave so the orchestrator can verify regeneration occurred.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool calls (load_opplan, read_file, task) and specific paths, but they are orchestration-style invocations rather than copy-paste runnable code, matching 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (Step 1, 2, 3A/3B branching) with confirmation checkpoints and a delegation path for missing docs, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and no unnecessary bundle files; fits 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |