Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow, built-in validation via negative controls, and a promotion-rule checklist. It is strong on conciseness and structure; the main gap is the absence of concrete tool commands for full actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (scope, five-step workflow, promotion rule) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The instruction-only guidance is concrete and specific (records exact fields like "executable hashes, engine version, platform, symbols, server commit", lists authoritative values, defines a negative-control validation), but lacks specific executable commands or tool invocations that would make it copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step workflow with explicit validation (step 4 negative control, server-observed state transition) and a promotion-rule checklist requiring post-remediation replay; falls just short of 5 because no explicit error-recovery feedback loop ('if validation fails, retry') is stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, organized into three well-labeled sections (Scope, Research workflow, Promotion rule), matching the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |