Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured playbook with concrete commands and executable remediation code, fitting its single-file scope. It loses points for a pseudocode flash-loan PoC and for lacking explicit validation checkpoints/assertions in its workflow steps.
Suggestions
Replace the 'Pseudo' flash-loan PoC with runnable Foundry code (actual flash-loan + swap + revert-and-reverse calls) so the primary exploit example is copy-paste ready.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the audit workflow — e.g., a `forge test` step with assertions that gate progression and a clear 'verify PoC profits / reverts as expected' checkpoint after each test.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with actionable specifics; it assumes competence and avoids explaining what an oracle or a flash loan is, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste grep commands and mostly executable Solidity, but the primary flash-loan PoC is explicitly labeled 'Pseudo' with commented-out steps rather than runnable code, leaving one key example incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The audit steps are clearly sequenced (locate → trace → validate staleness → trace use), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or pass/fail assertions for the PoC runs — the stale-price test comments 'If we reach here w/o revert → bug' but performs no assert that gates continuation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this is a single self-contained SKILL.md; it is well-organized into clearly headed sections (vectors, audit steps, PoC, severity, remediation) appropriate for a skill under the reference threshold. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |