Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable playbook with executable Foundry/tooling commands, a clear audit workflow, and a success criterion that acts as a validation checkpoint; the only gap is an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~40 lines) with no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (variants, audit steps, PoC, CVSS, exemplars) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, specific commands such as `solidity_scan_file`, `foundry_reentrancy_test(target="Vault", function="withdraw", target_path="src/Vault.sol")`, and `forge test -vvv --match-contract Test_withdraw`, plus concrete per-hit checks. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered audit sequence (scan -> per-hit checks -> call-graph trace -> PoC) with an explicit success criterion as the validation checkpoint, but no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop is spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, no bundle files present, and content is organized into well-signaled sections (Variants, Audit steps, PoC, Success criteria, CVSS, Known exemplars), meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |