CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wireless-security

Wireless network security reconnaissance — WiFi analysis, Bluetooth assessment, RFID/NFC evaluation, signal capture, protocol analysis, encryption testing, rogue device detection.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/decepticon/decepticon/skills/standard/recon/wireless-security/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a broad, well-organized command catalog but functions as a monolithic reference rather than a guided workflow, with command typos and no validation feedback loops for destructive operations. Splitting it into per-domain reference files and fixing tool names would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Fix non-executable tool names ('airolump-ng' → 'airodump-ng', 'airecrack-ng' → 'aircrack-ng') so commands are copy-paste ready and actionability can reach 3.

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to destructive and batch workflows (deauth, handshake capture, key cracking) — e.g., 'verify handshake captured with wpaclean before cracking' — to lift workflow clarity.

Split the monolithic body into reference files (e.g., references/wifi.md, references/bluetooth.md, references/rfid-nfc.md) with a concise overview and one-level-deep links in SKILL.md for proper progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely compact command listings, but it opens with concept fluff Claude already knows ('Wireless network security reconnaissance involves identifying, analyzing…') and repeats tools (airodump-ng, kismet) across sections, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Most entries are concrete executable commands, but several are non-executable due to typos ('airolump-ng', 'airecrack-ng') or stub placeholders ('Requires specialized tools', 'Requires GNU Radio setup'), placing it at the score-2 'incomplete guidance' anchor rather than fully copy-paste ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sections follow a logical reconnaissance order, but destructive/batch operations (deauthentication, key cracking) lack validation checkpoints or feedback loops, capping workflow clarity at 2 per the guideline.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a 370-line monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files; well-organized into sections, but content that should be split (WiFi, Bluetooth, RFID/NFC, attacks) is inline, matching the score-2 'could be better organized / should be separate' anchor.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive with strong natural trigger terms, but it omits an explicit 'Use when…' usage clause, so it answers 'what' but not 'when'. Adding a trigger clause would raise completeness.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when…' clause naming wireless-security scenarios (e.g., wardriving, packet capture, rogue AP detection) to satisfy the completeness 'when' requirement.

Tighten 'analysis'/'assessment' verbs toward more concrete actions (e.g., 'capture WiFi handshakes', 'crack WPA keys') to sharpen specificity beyond domain-level labels.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions — 'signal capture', 'encryption testing', 'rogue device detection' — across named wireless domains rather than vague abstractions, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' (the enumerated wireless tasks) but has no 'Use when…' clause or explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 2 per the judging guideline.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say ('WiFi analysis', 'Bluetooth assessment', 'RFID/NFC', 'signal capture', 'rogue device detection') with good breadth, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear wireless-security niche with distinct triggers unlikely to collide with other skills, matching the score-3 anchor; it is well above the generic 'helps with code and documents' level.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
PurpleAILAB/Decepticon
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.