Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable and exceptionally well-sequenced with strong validation gates, but it is token-heavy due to pervasive design-rationale prose and monolithically inlines content that progressive disclosure would split into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim design-rationale paragraphs (e.g., 'Why it takes the round rather than riding beside the answer', 'It was built the other way first...') to the operational rule only, cutting hundreds of tokens without losing guidance.
Move the detailed evidence-lane fan-out rules (Step 3-A2) and the refine-gate JSON templates into a reference file under references/ and link to it one level deep, raising progressive disclosure and reducing inline weight.
Clarify the ambiguous 'Generate a PM' phrasing in the description to something concrete like 'Produce a Product Requirements Document (PRD) via a guided interview'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is noticeably verbose, mixing operational instruction with extensive design rationale ('It was built the other way first, with a second parameter for findings...', 'What this does not license', repeated anti-pattern justifications) that pads tokens without aiding execution; it is above the severely-verbose anchor but below the mostly-efficient one. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready tool-call blocks, exact JSON payloads for AskUserQuestion, concrete bash commands, and explicit argument templates covering the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Step 0-Step 5 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (deferred-schema guard, fail-closed on tool-not-found, refine-gate confirmation, meta.is_complete completion check, generation_failed retry) and error-recovery feedback loops throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and all ~450 lines are inlined in SKILL.md; sections are well-organized, but large bodies like the fan-out/evidence-lane rules and refine-gate templates are inline content that could live in separate files, matching the some-structure-but-could-be-better-organized anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |