Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent operational skill body: fully executable commands, a complete plan template, and a validation-gated workflow (check → preview → submit with digest → background collect) with explicit error-recovery loops. The only refinements are consolidating the repeatedly stated never-do-it-yourself rule and potentially moving the plan schema detail to a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operation-specific — CLI subcommands, refusal rules, the plan-file schema — with essentially no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5: the 'never do the work yourself / never bill without a preview' rule is restated across the preamble, §4, and §5 ('Never redo a failed item yourself in this session') and could be consolidated; not 3 because the trimming opportunity is minor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step ships exact, copy-paste-ready commands — '"${QWEN_CODE_CLI:-qwen}" batch check', 'batch run .qwen/batch/plans/<slug>.json --dry-run', 'run ... --expect <digest>', 'collect <task-id> --wait' — plus a complete JSON plan template with field-level rules. Not 4: no gaps; the placeholders (<slug>, <task-id>) are the only variables and are defined inline. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | §0–§5 give a clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints for a billed batch operation: an unbilled readiness check, an unbilled dry-run preview, digest pinning via '--expect', and two feedback loops (preview mismatch → re-preview and reshow; plan-field error → fix once and preview again). Not 4: validation is not merely present but woven into every spending decision, matching the validate→fix→retry anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent) and the single SKILL.md is well organized into numbered sections with no nested or dangling references, so navigation is trivial. Not 5: at roughly 190 lines the plan-file schema and its field rules are all inline where a reference file could hold the detail; not 3 because structure is clear and nothing is buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |