Conciseness

The body is lean — bullet-driven, assumes competence, and explains nothing Claude already knows — but the doc-path-consumer guidance (qc-helper index tables, `_meta.ts`, `.qwen/skills/`) appears in full in both step 5 and "Practical heuristics", a redundant block that could be trimmed. This is a minor instance of repetition rather than the tight every-token-earns-its-place ideal, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

Actionability

Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact commands ("git status --short", "git diff --stat", targeted "git diff"), exact path mappings (docs/users/**, docs/developers/**, docs/_meta.ts, docs/users/configuration/settings.md, packages/core/src/skills/bundled/qc-helper/SKILL.md), and concrete search/verification steps. There are no vague directives left unbacked by a specific file, command, or path.

Workflow Clarity

The five steps are clearly sequenced, and step 5 is an explicit validation checklist (search docs/ for old names, confirm links and paths, confirm _meta.ts registration, re-read changed docs against the code diff) with a re-check feedback loop. This matches the anchor with explicit validation steps and a verification checklist.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good: clearly headed sections, and one well-signaled one-level-deep reference (references/docs-surface.md, which exists and is conditionally triggered). However, the doc-path-consumer detail (qc-helper tables, .qwen/skills/ consumers) is fully duplicated between SKILL.md and docs-surface.md rather than split, leaving minor organization gaps that keep it below the cleanly-split top anchor.

Specificity

"Review local code changes with git diff and update the official docs under docs/ to match" names the domain and two highly concrete actions with specifics (git diff, docs/), sitting between the 1-2-action anchor (3) and the several-actions anchor (5). It does not enumerate further sub-actions (e.g., locating pages, updating navigation), so it does not reach 5.

Completeness

It clearly answers both questions: the what ("Review local code changes with git diff and update the official docs under docs/ to match") and the when via an explicit "Use when..." clause with concrete trigger phrases. This matches the anchor-5 good example structurally.

Trigger Term Quality

It explicitly quotes natural phrases users would say: "git diff", "local changes", "update docs", "official docs", plus paraphrases like "document current uncommitted work", "sync docs with local changes", and "update docs after a feature or refactor". Coverage of natural terms and synonyms is comprehensive for this domain, matching the top anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination (local diff → docs sync) is a clear niche with mostly distinct triggers, but "git diff" alone could also fire for commit-message or code-review skills and "update docs" for general docs-writing skills, so minor overlap risk with closely related skills remains. Not 5 because those individual terms are shared with adjacent skills.