Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill: lean prose, concrete git commands and docs paths, a sequenced workflow with an explicit validation cross-check, and a properly signaled single-level reference. It avoids concept-explanation fluff and matches the rubric's good examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives concrete commands and paths without explaining git or docs concepts Claude already knows, so nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific executable commands (git status --short, git diff --stat, git diff) and concrete file-path targets (docs/users/**, docs/developers/**, _meta.ts, settings.md), giving copy-ready instruction rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow culminates in an explicit cross-check step with validation checkpoints (search for stale names, confirm links, re-read against the diff), satisfying the feedback-loop requirement for batch doc edits. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that delegates the detailed surface map to a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/docs-surface.md, verified present), keeping the SKILL.md scoped and navigable. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |