Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is tight, executable, and clearly sequenced with validation and verification steps. The main gap is a dangling reference to an examples file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Either add the examples/ directory with react-reconciler-performance-measure-leak.md or remove/soften the broken reference in the Worked Example section.
Consider marking the Node.js 22+ and chrome-devtools version requirements as prerequisites-only to avoid any time-sensitivity read on conciseness.
The external tmux-real-user-testing skill reference is fine, but a one-line note on what it provides would reduce the navigation hop for readers without it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and command-driven with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; prose notes are minimal and tied to actionable gotchas. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (helper eval, kill -USR2, chrome-devtools subcommands) with explicit placeholders, and the referenced find-leaf-node.sh script exists and is runnable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with a multi-snapshot comparison feedback loop and an explicit Step 6 'Verify Fix' checkpoint confirming stabilization. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections and a real bundle script, but the worked-example reference points to examples/react-reconciler-performance-measure-leak.md which does not exist in the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |