CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

governance-readiness-assessor

Assess AAP platform governance readiness -- full 7-domain audit or scoped to specific domains. Use when: - Full assessment: "Is my AAP ready for production?", "Audit my platform governance" - Scoped assessment: "Assess my credentials setup", "Check my RBAC", "How are my notifications configured?" - "What should I fix before executing jobs?" - "Assess my AAP configuration" - Any question about a specific governance domain (credentials, RBAC, workflows, notifications, EEs, instance groups, audit, auth) NOT for: executing jobs (use governance-executor) or troubleshooting failures (use forensic-troubleshooter).

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestration skill with excellent progressive disclosure: all domain detail lives in a real, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference, and remediation is gated behind explicit human approval. The main cost is token redundancy from duplicated MCP/tool listings and repeatedly restated citation rules, which keeps conciseness at the midpoint.

Suggestions

Remove the Dependencies section's 'Required MCP Servers' and 'Required MCP Tools' lists, which duplicate the Prerequisites section and Step 2's tool-per-domain mapping; a pointer back to those sections would suffice.

State the Red Hat citation mandate once in Step 3 and drop its restatements in the scoped-assessment note and both examples, keeping only the self-check checklist as the enforcement mechanism.

Trim the 'When to Use This Skill' section, which substantially restates the frontmatter description's trigger and NOT-for lists; keep only the domain-routing map that adds new information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is operational rather than explanatory, but contains noticeable redundancy: the Dependencies section repeats the MCP server list from Prerequisites and the tool list from Step 2, and the Red Hat citation mandate is restated in Step 3, the self-check checklist, the scoped-assessment note, and both examples. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' better than anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact MCP tool names with parameters (e.g., 'workflow_job_templates_list ... page_size: 100'), a mandatory per-domain output format template, a scope-detection decision table, condition-driven adaptive queries (4a-4d), concrete cross-domain correlation patterns (5a-5d), and a remediation tool mapping table. A complete worked example output block is included.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: MCP server validation as a prerequisite, a citation self-check checklist before emitting each domain, feedback loops (downgrade domains to WARN when depth checks fail), and mandatory human approval before any remediation action. This matches the top anchor for sequence plus explicit validation and error-recovery handling.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md serves as a process overview while the 7-domain detail, decision tables, citations, and output template are correctly externalized to a single well-signaled reference (references/aap/governance-readiness.md), which exists in the bundle and contains exactly the claimed content. The reference is one level deep, mandated as a first read, and repeated in the Dependencies section, making navigation easy.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it clearly states what the skill does, provides explicit and natural trigger phrases for both full and scoped assessments, and cleanly boundaries itself against sibling skills. The only weakness is a narrow action vocabulary (assess/audit), which keeps specificity just below the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description states 'Assess AAP platform governance readiness -- full 7-domain audit or scoped to specific domains' and enumerates the concrete coverage areas (credentials, RBAC, workflows, notifications, EEs, instance groups, audit, auth), giving several specific capabilities with a clear full/scoped distinction. It falls short of anchor 5 because the action vocabulary is limited to assess/audit rather than multiple distinct concrete actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both questions are explicitly answered: the 'what' ('full 7-domain audit or scoped to specific domains') and the 'when' via an explicit 'Use when:' list of concrete trigger phrases. This matches the top anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural user phrases such as "Is my AAP ready for production?", "Audit my platform governance", "Assess my credentials setup", "Check my RBAC", and "How are my notifications configured?", plus comprehensive domain synonyms (EEs, auth, instance groups). This matches the anchor for comprehensive natural-term coverage including synonyms.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche (AAP governance readiness assessment) and adds an explicit boundary ('NOT for: executing jobs (use governance-executor) or troubleshooting failures (use forensic-troubleshooter)'), minimizing conflict risk with sibling skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 3 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository

RHEcosystemAppEng/agentic-plugins

Path

rh-automation/skills/governance-readiness-assessor/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.