Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced operational guide with strong validation and HITL discipline around destructive operations. Its weakness is repetition: duplicated fallback boilerplate and per-call parameter restating inflate the token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
State the OpenShift PVC fallback once (in Prerequisites or a short convention note) and reference it by name from Steps 3/5/6 instead of repeating the full three-sentence fallback each time.
Collapse the repeated per-call parameter blocks by defining a convention (e.g., all rhoai tools take `namespace` plus the target resource `name`) once in Prerequisites, then only listing call-specific parameters in the workflow.
Move the three inlined Issue subsections into references/common-issues.md (keeping only a one-line pointer each), and either link or remove the orphaned known-model-profiles.md and live-doc-lookup.md reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No concept-explaining fluff, but the PVC fallback sentence ("If rhoai unavailable or returns error: Use `resources_list`/`resources_create_or_update`/`resources_delete`... See openshift-fallback-templates.md#pvc...") is repeated nearly verbatim three times, and dozens of per-call parameter blocks ("namespace - REQUIRED", "name - REQUIRED") restate what the Prerequisites section already enumerated. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step names the exact MCP tool, concrete parameter values (apiVersion, kind, labelSelector, JSONPath fields like `.spec.tags[].from.name`), verbatim user-facing prompts, and specific fallback patterns — copy-paste-ready guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with intent routing, and validation checkpoints appear throughout: namespace validation, PVC Bound/Pending verification, startup polling with an explicit give-up window, state-change verification after stop, and mandatory confirmation gates with data-loss warnings before every destructive operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are real bundle files, one level deep, and clearly signaled with purpose; however the three inlined "Issue" subsections duplicate content delegated to common-issues.md, and known-model-profiles.md and live-doc-lookup.md exist in the bundle but are never referenced from the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |