Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-organized with real, one-level references and a sensible two-step workflow, but it is undermined by a non-executable code example, an inconsistent script path, and a duplicated heading.
Suggestions
Fix the example import path to 'scripts.kronos_predictor' and use the documented get_base_forecast(df, lookback, pred_len, news_text) call so the snippet is copy-paste executable.
Remove the duplicated '### 1. Forecast Market Trends' heading and the unused DatabaseManager import.
Add a brief validation/feedback checkpoint after the agentic adjustment step (e.g., verify the adjusted forecast has the same number of data points as the base forecast).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but a duplicated '### 1. Forecast Market Trends' heading, an unused DatabaseManager import in the example, and minor redundancy mean it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete signatures and a code example are present, but the example is not executable: it imports from 'scripts.utils.kronos_predictor' (which does not exist; the real file is 'scripts/kronos_predictor.py') and calls predict() with a horizon argument that does not match the documented get_base_forecast(df, lookback, pred_len, news_text) signature. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A two-step sequence (base forecast then adjustment) is listed, but there are no validation checkpoints and the duplicated heading muddies the structure. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with one-level-deep, well-signaled references to references/PROMPTS.md and scripts/kronos_predictor.py, both of which exist as real bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |