Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly executable reference, but it lacks validation steps for the batch `learn` operation and leaves several commands without invocation examples.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after `learn` (e.g. run `npx anime-mori status` to confirm the codebase was indexed and check staleness).
Provide `npx` invocation examples for the remaining commands (analyze, insights, patterns, predict, status), not just learn/server/search.
Replace the generic 'README.md — Full documentation' pointer with topic-specific references (e.g. setup, tool reference, language support).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean reference material (commands, tools table, file map) with only minor over-explanation such as the opening quote and the 'session amnesia' motivation sentence. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Three commands ship executable `npx anime-mori ...` examples, but `analyze`, `insights`, `patterns`, `predict`, and `status` list only one-line descriptions with no invocation examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | `learn` is a batch operation that parses an entire codebase, yet there is no validation or verification step, so workflow clarity is capped at 3 per the batch-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section structure with a one-level-deep pointer to README.md and source directories; minor gaps since the README reference is generic ('Full documentation') without per-topic navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |