Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, phased workflow with executable Kotlin and REST examples and an explicit verification checklist — it teaches only RevenueCat-specific behavior Claude would not know. The only real weaknesses are repeated statements about managementURL nullability and a mostly-inline structure with no reference files despite being over 50 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and technical with no tutorials on known concepts, but the 'managementURL is null for paused and account hold subscribers' fact is repeated three times and 'do not call Uri.parse(url.toString())' appears twice. Not 5 because this repetition means not every token earns its place; not 3 because there are no genuinely unnecessary explanations. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: complete Kotlin snippets for cancellation and pause detection, the showManageSubscriptions call, a full curl command, and exact REST paths with request bodies. Not 4 because there are no real gaps — setup prerequisites are stated in Phase 2 and the only placeholders (pro_access, showCancellationBanner) are appropriately app-specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Scope, Prepare, Execute, Verify phases give a clear sequence, and the Verify table is an explicit checklist of five concrete checks (e.g., 'Cancel in Play Store, pull fresh CustomerInfo, confirm unsubscribeDetectedAt != null and isActive == true'). Not 4 because validation checkpoints are explicit and checkable rather than implicit; no destructive or batch operations, so the feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned phases with a clearly signaled one-level-deep References section, and no bundle files exist to create nested navigation. Not 5 because at roughly 100 lines some content (REST endpoint details, Notes) could live in a reference file and the cross-skill mentions (rc-payment-recovery, rc-webhooks) are inline name-drops rather than clearly signaled links; not 3 because structure and signaling are solid. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |