Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The SKILL.md body is a tight, well-sequenced overview that assumes Claude's competence and provides a strong verification checklist, but its progressive-disclosure design is undermined because every referenced platform detail file (platforms/*.md) is absent from the bundle. The shared-concepts guidance is concrete and actionable; only the missing detail layer keeps it from scoring higher.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced platform files (platforms/ios.md, platforms/android.md, platforms/kmp.md, platforms/flutter.md, platforms/react-native.md) — the body explicitly delegates implementation to them, so their absence breaks the skill's progressive-disclosure structure.
If the platform files cannot be bundled, inline at least one complete purchase+restore function (e.g. for iOS) so the skill is executable end-to-end without external files.
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the Verify section (e.g. 'if a checkpoint fails, fix and re-run') so the validation checklist doubles as a retry path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it states the flow ('Call getOfferings(), pick a Package, call purchase(package)') and per-platform cancellation/error specifics without explaining what RevenueCat is or how SDKs work; every rationale sentence (e.g. the iOS legal restore-button requirement) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete inline API references ('getOfferings()', 'purchase(package)', 'customerInfo.entitlements.active["<id>"]', 'e.userCancelled === true') and specific per-platform error codes are actionable, but no complete executable function appears in the body — the full implementation is deferred to the platform files, so minor gaps remain. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-step process (detect platform → shared concepts → implement → verify) culminates in an explicit validation checklist ('Do not claim the flow works until: 1...2...3...4...') covering success, cancellation, double-purchase, and restore paths — a strong checkpoint list for a money-affecting flow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview is well-structured and references are clearly signaled one-level-deep ('platforms/ios.md', 'platforms/android.md', etc.), but those referenced platform files do not exist in the bundle — the detail layer the structure depends on is missing, so the disclosure is incomplete rather than appropriately split. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |