Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately lean and points Claude to the right tool and docs, but lacks specifics on which MCP operations to perform or when to consult the docs versus the MCP server. Adding a short list of key MCP operations would improve actionability.
Suggestions
List 2-3 key RevenueCat MCP operations (e.g., 'get_customer_purchase_history', 'list_offerings') so Claude knows what is callable without browsing docs.
Clarify when to consult the docs URL versus calling the MCP server directly (e.g., 'Call the MCP server for live data; consult the docs only for schema/field reference').
Add a minimal section header (e.g., '## Usage') to give the short body light structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The two-sentence body ('Use the RevenueCat MCP server for all interaction with RevenueCat' and the docs URL with the '.md' tip) is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no padding, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'; it is not a 4 because there are no over-explanation instances to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete pointers (named MCP server, specific docs URL, the '.md' URL trick) but no executable commands or specific MCP tool calls, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'; it is not a 4 because which MCP operations to use are unspecified, and not a 2 because the pointers are specific rather than mere hints. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill whose core action ('Use the RevenueCat MCP server for all interaction with RevenueCat') is unambiguous, scoring near the top per the simple-skill note; it is not a 5 because the secondary instruction to consult docs introduces a mild branch without specifying when each path applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is appropriately brief with no monolithic wall of text and no nested references (only a one-level external docs pointer), and no bundle files exist to misorganize; it is not a 5 because there are no section headers to structure the content, even though little structure is needed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |