Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-organized, concise, and offers clear sequenced workflows with validation checkpoints and error recovery. Its main weakness is actionability, since workflows are arrow-shorthand pseudocode rather than executable commands, and progressive disclosure is unaddressed with all content inlined.
Suggestions
Convert workflow arrow shorthand into concrete, executable invocations (e.g., real browser_* tool call syntax or runnable code snippets) so guidance is copy-paste ready.
Move large reference tables (e.g., the full selector catalog and error-recovery table) into a bundled reference file and link to it from a concise overview, improving progressive disclosure.
Add a brief overview section at the top summarizing the skill's purpose and pointing to the detailed reference and workflow sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean reference tables and terse numbered workflows with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Selectors and tool names are concrete, but the workflows use arrow shorthand ('browser_navigate -> store homepage') as pseudocode rather than executable code/commands, leaving them not copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced with explicit checkpoints (browser_read_page to verify, a STOP/wait-for-approval gate) plus an error-recovery table, matching a clear sequence with validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and everything is inlined in a single ~125-line file; it is well-sectioned but lacks an overview-pointing-to-references structure and inlines reference material (selectors, error recovery) that could be split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |