CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

jira

Jira project management expert for issues, sprints, workflows, and reporting

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./crates/openfang-skills/bundled/jira/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is lean, highly actionable, and well-organized for a single-file guidance skill, with concrete JQL and Jira-specific detail throughout. The one gap is the lack of explicit validation/feedback loops for risky operations like bulk workflow transitions.

Suggestions

Add a short validation step for risky operations, e.g., before bulk-transitioning issues or moving an issue backward in the workflow, confirm the change in a comment and re-check board status — a 'validate -> fix -> retry' loop.

Optionally include a brief sequenced workflow (e.g., create epic -> break into stories -> groom -> add to sprint -> track via JQL) with explicit checkpoints to lift workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean bullets with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows (it never explains what Jira, sprints, or epics are), and the JQL section is tight and direct. It is not 2 because there is no unnecessary prose that could be tightened.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready JQL queries and concrete specifics — the Epic > Story > Task > Sub-task hierarchy, named link types ('blocks', 'is blocked by', 'relates to', 'duplicates'), exact workflow states, and a named good/bad title example. It is not 2 because the guidance is complete and executable rather than pseudocode or abstract.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sections are topically organized with implied sequencing (e.g., sprint-planning considerations), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for potentially destructive or batch operations such as bulk transitions or moving issues backward. It is not 1 because steps/sequence are present, and not 3 because validation and error-recovery loops are missing.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

At ~48 body lines with no need for external references, the well-organized sections (Key Principles, Issue Management, Sprint Planning, JQL Queries, Workflow Best Practices, Pitfalls) satisfy the simple-skills note that progressive disclosure can score 3 with just clear organization. It is not 2 because there is no inline content that should be split out.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

72%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person, concise, and uses strong natural trigger vocabulary with a clear Jira niche. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' clause and the listing of categories rather than concrete actions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to create or organize Jira issues, plan sprints, configure workflows, or generate reports.'

Replace area nouns with concrete verbs to raise specificity, e.g., 'Jira project management expert that creates and organizes issues, plans sprints, configures workflows, and generates reports.'

Include a few high-frequency variations such as 'epics', 'backlog', 'JQL', or 'boards' to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'Jira project management expert for issues, sprints, workflows, and reporting' names the domain and enumerates sub-areas, but these are categories/nouns rather than concrete actions (e.g., 'create issues, plan sprints, configure workflows, generate reports'). It is not 1 because it is specific rather than vague, and not 3 because it lists no multiple concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill is (a Jira expert for issues/sprints/workflows/reporting) but has no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit trigger, so completeness caps at 2 per the judging guidelines. It is not 1 because the 'what' is clear, and not 3 because the 'when' is missing rather than explicit.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Jira', 'project management', 'issues', 'sprints', 'workflows', and 'reporting' are exactly the natural terms a user would say when they need this skill. It is not 2 because coverage of common vocabulary is strong rather than partial.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Explicit 'Jira' anchoring carves a clear product niche with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for the wrong skill. It is not 2 because the Jira brand plus specific PM areas make it clearly distinguishable rather than merely 'somewhat specific'.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
RightNow-AI/openfang
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.