Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, fully executable multi-step workflow with strong validation checkpoints for its destructive operations. It could split some reference material into bundle files and trim a little explanatory prose, but otherwise earns its tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and dominated by executable commands with minimal padding, but it carries several explanatory prose paragraphs (e.g. the rationale for excluding major bumps) that, while justified, could be trimmed slightly, placing it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step ships copy-paste-ready bash with real flags and a concrete ordered-list example, covering the common cases fully; placeholders like <branch-1> are inherent to the task rather than pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Step 0-5 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (stop on 0-1 PRs, stop and resolve on rebase conflict, a Verify section) and feedback loops for the destructive force-push/rebase operations, satisfying the batch/destructive validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections with no deep nesting, but no bundle files exist and all material is inline in a ~150-line file; structure is good though a couple of sections (ordering rules, conflict resolution) could optionally be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |