Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable — executable code, a critical registration command, and concrete naming conventions — with a clear numbered workflow and a useful troubleshooting checklist. Its weaknesses are efficiency and structure: it re-teaches the standard Stimulus API inline and keeps all ~205 lines in SKILL.md instead of splitting reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Trim or drop the 'Key Concepts' section — targets, values, actions, and classes are standard Stimulus API that Claude already knows; keep only project-specific deviations (e.g., local conventions for controller organization).
Move the API reference (targets/values/actions/classes) and 'Common Patterns' into a references/ file (e.g. references/patterns.md) and link to them from SKILL.md, keeping the body as a lean create-register-use overview.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the main workflow (e.g., 'after running stimulus:manifest:update, confirm the controller appears in index.js before wiring HTML') so verification is part of the sequence rather than only in Troubleshooting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The "Key Concepts" section (~60 lines covering targets, values, actions, and classes) restates the standard Stimulus API that Claude already knows from training, and trivial patterns like "Toggle Visibility" and empty connect/disconnect stubs pad the body. The material is code-style rather than prose padding, so it is above level 2, but the unnecessary explanation is more than the 'minor instances' of level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is executable: a copy-paste controller template, the concrete registration command `bin/rails stimulus:manifest:update`, a manual-registration fallback, and working Slim/HTML usage examples. The naming-conventions table with a concrete multi-word mapping ("bulk_submit_controller.js → \"bulk-submit\"") covers the common real cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Creating a controller is a clearly numbered 1-2-3 sequence with the registration step flagged **CRITICAL** and a Troubleshooting section providing an error-recovery checklist (verify registration, re-run manifest update, check console). It falls short of level 5 because validation lives in a separate troubleshooting section rather than an explicit in-flow checkpoint before using the controller. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~205-line body is entirely inline with no bundle files or reference splits — the Stimulus API reference (targets, values, actions modifiers, classes) and "Common Patterns" are natural candidates for separate reference files per the rubric's overview-plus-references rationale. Sections and the one-level-deep "Related Skills" links are well organized, which lifts it above level 2's monolithic wall, but 'content that should be separate is inline' fits level 3 best. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |