CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sqlitecpp-ci-workflows

SQLiteCpp CI workflow patterns. Use for GitHub Actions, AppVeyor, Travis, matrices, or test steps.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A token-efficient, highly actionable CI reference with concrete commands and a thoughtful, well-reasoned coverage-debugging section. Organization is clear; the main improvement would be tightening the coverage prose and adding explicit gated checkpoints where workflows branch.

Suggestions

Tighten the coverage section's prose (e.g. the multi-line pack expansion and guard explanations) into terser bullets so every line earns its place for conciseness.

Add explicit validation checkpoints for the build/test flows (e.g. 'if ctest fails, fix and re-run before proceeding') to lift workflow clarity.

Consider extracting the long coverage API/root-cause guidance into a references file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, improving progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely lean and command-driven with no padding about what CI/CMake is; the coverage-debugging prose is non-obvious knowledge that earns its place but adds enough length to keep it just below fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides exact, copy-paste-ready commands and CMake flags (e.g. 'ctest --verbose --output-on-failure', 'meson setup builddir -DSQLITECPP_BUILD_TESTS=true ...') plus executable curl examples covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Common steps are sequenced and per-platform sections are clear; the coverage section includes a feedback loop (root-cause before giving up, fixable vs leave). Parallel reference-style platform sections lack explicit gated checkpoints, capping it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with well-organized per-platform sections and no nested references; slightly over the simple-skill line and with no bundle files, so good structure rather than exemplary multi-file disclosure.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-structured description that clearly states both the skill's purpose and its trigger conditions. It is mostly distinct and actionable, with only minor gaps in synonym coverage and a slight generic-action-verb quality.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete CI targets ('GitHub Actions, AppVeyor, Travis, matrices, or test steps'); 'patterns' is slightly generic as the action verb, keeping it just below comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('SQLiteCpp CI workflow patterns') and when ('Use for GitHub Actions, AppVeyor, Travis, matrices, or test steps') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'GitHub Actions', 'AppVeyor', 'Travis', 'matrices', and 'test steps' are natural terms users would say; missing a few synonyms like 'continuous integration' or file extensions.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to SQLiteCpp CI, giving it a clear niche, but the platform triggers (GitHub Actions/AppVeyor/Travis) are generic enough to risk minor overlap with general CI skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
SRombauts/SQLiteCpp
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.