Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean yet actionable, with a well-sequenced multi-step workflow containing explicit validation checkpoints and clearly signaled external references. It avoids verbosity and concept over-explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-rich without explaining basics Claude already knows; concrete commands like `git diff`/`git status` earn their tokens and the prose assumes competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance - `git diff`, `git status`, `/fable-judge suite <target>` - plus a precise ordered procedure and a concrete catalogue of frauds to hunt, fully actionable for an instruction-style skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The default mode is a clearly numbered 1-5 sequence with an explicit validation step ("Re-run every claimed verification yourself") and an evidence-first verdict step; suite mode is similarly sequenced. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Keeps the detailed fraud catalogue and domain adapters external in fable-method's `references/failure-modes.md` and `references/domains/`, with clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers rather than inlining them. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |