Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise orchestration loop with clear sequencing and verification checkpoints. It leans heavily on a sibling skill for its rule details and has no bundle files, leaving some load-bearing content external rather than explicitly disclosed.
Suggestions
Inline a one-line definition of the referenced gates (intent, recall, authorization) so the body is self-contained rather than deferring all rules to the sibling fable-method SKILL.md.
Confirm or create the referenced sibling skill path so the external dependency is a real, reachable reference.
Add a compact example of the plan artifact shape so the EXECUTE/VERIFY stages have a concrete anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what a subagent or plan is) and every line carries actionable load with no padding or concept re-explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete procedural guidance ('spawn... in ONE message', 'one batch plus one follow-up batch is the budget') but it is instruction-style without executable code/commands; the method's intent/recall/authorization gates are referenced rather than spelled out inline. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four stages are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints: a triviality gate, a decision gate after planning, adversarial verification with a hard 3-cycle bound, and an audit-before-report step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body relies on a sibling skill's SKILL.md as an external reference ('read its SKILL.md first') but there are no bundle files present and no in-skill references to load-bearing detail, so the one-level-deep reference is signaled but not actually provided here. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |