Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a concrete, executable single-step workflow with a clear success signal and tidy organization, but it is padded with redundant emphasis and lacks any failure-recovery guidance for a production deploy. It is effective but could be leaner and more robust.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated mandates into one statement so the "run ship.py, do not skip" instruction appears once instead of three to four times.
Add a brief feedback loop for failure, e.g. "If ship.py does not print 'Shipped.', re-run it and investigate before reporting the task complete."
Keep the existing concrete command and success signal as-is; these are the strongest parts of the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but restates the same mandate ("MUST run", "mandatory part of every config task", "considered an incomplete, failed task", "Always ship; do not ask") three to four times, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a fully executable command (``python ship.py``) and a specific, copy-paste-ready success signal (``printed "Shipped."``), matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is unambiguous with an explicit success checkpoint, but there is no error-recovery feedback loop for a production-fleet deploy, which the rubric says should cap this dimension at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and uses well-organized sections (intro plus "Required step after ANY config change"), so it qualifies for a 3 under the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |