Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is efficient, concrete, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with a literal curl fallback that makes it executable. The main gap is the absence of an output/error validation step in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, giving the model id, full prompt, and operational notes without explaining concepts Claude already knows; only minor guidance like "You can also suggest creating different themes" could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete model id (nano-banana-2-edit), a `muapi image edit` command with all parameters, and a literal curl fallback with polling; the primary invocation is semi-structured rather than a copy-paste command line, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear single-phase sequence with an explicit missing-input check (ask for the photo if absent); it lacks output/error validation, but the simple single-purpose nature keeps it above 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Inputs, Steps, Trigger Keywords, Notes), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |