Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong, actionable recipe with concrete prompts, named models, clear phased sequencing, and built-in regeneration feedback loops; it stays lean and avoids over-explaining known concepts. The main gap is progressive disclosure: everything is inlined in one file with no supporting reference files split out, which is acceptable for a self-contained skill but leaves structure at the midpoint.
Suggestions
If the skill grows, move the full per-phase prompt templates or the 'Notes for the Executing Agent' CLI/curl details into a single referenced file (e.g. references/prompts.md) and signal it from the body.
Add one explicit validation gate before the expensive Phase D video run (e.g. 'Only proceed to video generation once the storyboard is approved'), to lift workflow clarity to the top anchor.
Confirm the multi-reference field name for `gpt-image-2-image-to-image` (currently described as 'or the model's documented multi-ref field') so the Phase C step is fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient — concrete prompts, model IDs, and an ASCII pipeline diagram earn their place without restating concepts Claude already knows — with only minor sections (e.g. the 'Notes' rationale paragraphs and the duplicated bold restatement of the core idea under the H1) that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, near-executable guidance per phase: named models (`gpt-image-2-text-to-image`, `nano-banana-2`, `seedance-v2.0-i2v`), full prompt templates with `{{input}}` placeholders, aspect ratios, and a curl/poll fallback, with only small gaps like the exact `images_list` field name flagged as 'documented'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four phases (A–D) are clearly sequenced with explicit approval/confirmation checkpoints after each phase and feedback loops ('If a panel reads poorly, regenerate...'; regenerate Phase D first), missing only a fully explicit validate-before-proceed gate to reach the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files (references/scripts/assets) and the SKILL.md is a single well-sectioned document, but all detail — full prompt templates, pipeline notes, and agent-execution notes — is inlined rather than split into one-level-deep referenced files, so structure is present but content that could be separate is inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |