Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable recipe with concrete image-generation calls and clear phase sequencing. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: it flags a real risk (incorrect brand-name spelling) but provides no validation checkpoint in the actual step flow, capping that dimension at 3.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step after generation, e.g. "Verify the brand name is spelled correctly in each logo; if not, regenerate that concept" before presenting options to the user.
Specify the exact CLI flag for aspect ratio (e.g. `--aspect 1:1`) so the `muapi image generate` calls are fully copy-paste ready.
Move the curl-fallback boilerplate into a short reference or collapse it, since it adds length that most invocations won't need.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient: a tight input table, per-phase prompts, and brief notes; minor over-explanation appears in the "Notes for the Executing Agent" curl fallback boilerplate and restated heading, but no padded concept explanations. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each phase gives a concrete `muapi image generate` call with model, full prompt template, and aspect ratio — mostly copy-paste ready. Minor gaps: it relies on templated prompts with placeholders and omits exact CLI flag syntax (e.g. how aspect ratio is passed). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced into Phase A (3 concepts) and Phase B (mockup) with a post-generation selection loop, but there is no validation/checkpoint step for verifying the brand name is spelled correctly in outputs despite the Notes flagging this as a risk, so validation is implicit and absent from the flow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into Inputs, Steps (Phases A/B), Notes, and Trigger Keywords with no bundle files needed; the body is a reasonable single-file overview rather than a monolithic wall. It stays one level deep with no nested references, scoring well though it could offload the curl fallback to a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |